Friday, November 9, 2007

Comment worth posting

This was a comment worthing of posting...


I've read this article several times, and here are a few comments that I would like to make:

Karen Brittain Sain: As a nurse, she is entrusted with patients' lives. As a board member, she'll be entrusted with students' lives.

This is a self-glamorizing statement. It is overkill and over-the-top.

Mr. Buff was asked: What will you do to restore respect to the board and the school system? He said: Continue to be accountable to the school system and the community; to be accountable and open and above board.

This is just a nothing statement directed at both the administrative and the classified levels as being ineffective.

Mr. Hairfield was asked: What will you do to provide support for the superintendent and principals? He said: Focus on accountability. There is ample money in the system to reallocate to principals to make sure they have the necessary resources. This will eliminate the need for student fundraisers.

What you say, Mr. Hairfield, is actually true - there is plenty of total money - but what you don’t understand or know is that there will never be a clean and efficient distribution of that money. School districts have little ability or total control – they are restricted by state, federal, and local laws – of how to allocate those funds. I’m sure our finance people do the best they can and firing Randall Brackett is not the answer, as much as you would like it to be.

But let’s not stop there – let’s be bold and list a few of the jobs that should be eliminated, like, One currently being advertised, EC Health Information Manager: What the heck is this?? We have OT’s, PT’s, Psychologists, Speech Personnel, Physical Educators, Behavioral Specialists, Interpreters, and now School Nurses. I’d like to know why this position will exist and for what purpose. It sounds to me like a job trying to be squeezed in before the new board takes its place.

Safety Director. Why do we need a Safety Director to send out 8x10 brochures telling us to be careful not to trip and fall in the winter, to turn out the lights and to remember to close the doors? Who actually reads the paperwork that comes from this particular office? And what’s the percentage of staff that then lie by signing our names to those questionnaires indicating that we do read them? Surely, Mr. Burleson wouldn’t mind attaching this information to a few of his current emails that he sends out to everyone, in effect accomplishing the same thing, and being more effective, efficient, and less wasteful of paper resources, in his approach!

Mr. ID Badge-Taker/Photographer: Why not put capable machines into the schools that secretaries or principals can use to create a badge for each of their faculty? And, equipping each school with a few cameras would take care of getting enough pictures. These are not hard things to do.

And finally, to address your comment about the need to eliminate student fundraisers-For years and years it has long been the battle cry, and is as common as the day is long, of incoming politicians to espouse the cause of cutting student fundraisers. Lots of people want to cut them out. It is a point stated all over the country all of the time. Why? Because it plays well with parents who hate fundraisers, teachers who get tired of handing out the packets, and all staff who see money wasted on frivolous things, such as paying board members or hiring unneeded positions or even, in some people's minds, purchasing textbooks that aren’t needed because everything is online these days. Do you really think that smart, highly educated and qualified teachers and principals would hold fundraisers in the first place if they weren’t needed? The fact is, they are needed and they do produce funding in order to help children’s education.

As a matter of fact, I'd like to see a list of the fundraisers, festivals, wreath and plant sales, bake sales, book fairs, voucher sales, restaurant discount booklets, cow patty bingo runs, raffle sales, dinner theatre sales, BBQ sales, the number of times that parents were asked to donate and why, how much money is made from yearbook sales, drink and food machines throughout the district, etc., along with a description of each, the total amounts that each one brought in PER SCHOOL for 2006-2007 and to date for the current school year as well.

Let’s also take a look at the number of charity events district-wide that have been asked of employees to do. How much money was brought into the district from those that students and staff were asked and encouraged to solicit for? What profit and time were in those?

In one of your previous letters to the Herald, Mr. Hairfield, you said, "This board, time and again, has snubbed their nose at the people once they were elected and have cow towed to anything the administrators say." Well, now's your chance. I'm the people, Sir and Ma'am! Please don't snub your nose or cow tow to me.

Hello, Board…you out there?

11 comments:

Glen said...

The more i read this the more i agree. I didn't think of those jobs and I agree they should be elmininated. I don't feel the focus of the schools has been job creation as Hairfield states, but I could be wrong.

Please continue to comment.

Anonymous said...

When it comes to exceptional children and meeting their special needs, the law is quite specific. And I would say that unless you are familiar with the statutes regarding meeting these exceptional needs, you should be careful in advocating the elimination of EC support positions. If you arbitrarily disregard a diagnosed child's specific need, nothing will land you in court more quickly.

Glen said...

Thanks for the comment. I agree with you about the EC laws. I can't speak for the other commenter, but it sounds like the issue was with creating a cerical type position.

Do you know anymore about this position? Do other schools systems have this job?

Anonymous said...

I have been teaching in exceptional children for almost 10 years and was surprised at this position. i would like to know more about this position and what this position is supposed to be for to.

Anonymous said...

so to 'arbitrarily disregard a diagnosed child's specific need' and not subject ourselves to a potential lawsuit, this position must be written in a child's iep, meaning that this person would spend time solely working for this child in their best interest helping to provide them with the free and appropriate education they are entitled to. i believe my sister's children and some of the parent's in her support group need these type of people added in their iep also & included in all of their iep meetings as well.

Anonymous said...

My sources tell me that the EC Manager's position is clerical in the sense that this person will be assisting EC teachers with the mounds of paperwork they must complete on each student. There are timelines that must be met and as the number of strings on federal and state EC money get more numerous, the teachers find themselves overwhelmed with paper before they teach the first lick.

You can eliminate this job, but why would you? It's funded by a grant. And when the grant runs out, so does the position. We can foolishly turn down the grant and get NO benefit for our EC program, or we can take advantage of it and get SOME benefit.

Again, I caution you. There are many pots of money that are very specific in how they can be spent by a school system. Hairfield and the rest of Tim's brigade will soon find out that they cannot take THIS money and use it HERE. Buff knows this, but he has led these people and The Five Thousand around by the nose promising this and that. And they FELL for it.

Anonymous said...

HELLO BURKE COUNTY. IS ANYBODY OUT THERE...

Anonymous said...

Fire joel hastings get a new monkie,fire scott smith get a new flunkie,fire robert bonner and get a new junkie. Tim Tracy Rob and Karen Attention Hire a New Attorney who does not ride motorcycles with Kingpin and clean this Shithouse Out!

Anonymous said...

I wonder if Tim will be in court on the 20th? Who will run the store that day?

Anonymous said...

Isn't it great that we have new leaders that will not tolerate criminals in charge of the system! I am very pleased with the board showing the fat slob superintendent that he can have his way about everything. Let me tell you the truth about Burleson. He is known as the Teflon man. He makes sure that nothing sticks to him. Burleson is a master manipulator and served well at the pleasure of the previous board, not only doing their dirty work (destroying evidence of a crime) but also made sure that he was blameless at the same time. Come on people, how can you be so stupid? Oh I forgot, you moved in from up north where you ruined everything and needed to come down here and get a fresh start screwing our school system up for us. No school system should ever be set up where one man (Burleson) should have the power to make all pertinent decisions. That's why we have elections. So we can bring in people with a fresh view of things and not get stuck with a superintendent that thinks he is God.

Anonymous said...

You may have to rethink your statement about criminals being in charge-especially after Tracey and family go to court~!